lhh logo
Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Change Management Organizational Development Workforce Transformations

The Seven Worst M&A Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

The Seven Worst M&A Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

The Seven Worst M&A Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

The world has not lost its taste for M&As despite evidence that the gross majority are “abysmal failures.” LHH looks at the seven biggest mistakes organizations make during M&As and offers some practical suggestions on how to overcome them.

Charles de Sabran and Joanne Layne

Nearly three years ago, Prof. Roger Martin of the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management uttered one of the most infamous quotes ever about the state of global mergers and acquisitions.

“M&A is a mug’s game,” Martin wrote in the June 2016 issue of The Harvard Business Review, “in which typically 70%-90% of acquisitions are abysmal failures.”

Martin may have been guilty of hyperbole, but he certainly had the case studies to back up his claim: Microsoft and Nokia, Google and Motorola, Hewlett Packard and Autonomy, News Corporation and MySpace. These were all multibillion-dollar deals that ended with the acquiring company forced to sell off the acquired asset and write off nearly all of the money invested to bring the companies together.

Despite Martin’s assessment, the world does not seem to be losing its appetite for M&As.

In 2018, nearly $3.9 trillion in M&As were announced. It was not a record, but had the proposed marriage between U.S. cellular carriers Sprint and T-Mobile been allowed to proceed—it is currently in a state of limbo at the direction of regulators—it would have been one of the busiest years ever in M&A activity.

Given that every year sees a new wave of M&A activity, why do we continue to see such a poor record of success? Theories abound.

Currency fluctuations and trade wars can derail some deals. Sometimes, proposed M&As collide with shifting markets or unforeseen technological complications. And in many cases, acquiring companies simply overpay for an asset and underestimate the costs of integration.

There is, however, a common thread running through most botched M&As: failed cultural integration.

Deloitte has estimated that failed cultural integration is a primary cause in about 30 percent of failed M&As. Bain & Company has identified cultural integration as the number one cause of M&A failure. 

After reviewing the details of M&As that Lee Hecht Harrison (LHH) has seen up close, we’ve identified seven common mistakes related to cultural integration that bring down many promising M&As.

The Seven Worst M&A Mistakes

The New Company Obsession

Trying to deliberately erase one of the legacy cultures. Every company has a unique DNA that, like humans, is deeply ingrained in all that they are and do. Many leaders make the mistake of thinking that the DNA of an acquired company will just disappear. However, experience tells us that there will always be trace elements of the DNA of both organizations in an integrated company. Failure to acknowledge this reality can lead to fear, resentment and—ultimately—a failure to fully integrate.

The Ivory Tower Syndrome

When fear invades the senior leadership team. For many leaders, an M&A can trigger fears about their own careers. They may worry about losing influence, status, power or, ultimately, their job. This anxiety is exacerbated by the fact that integrations can take many months, if not years, to complete. This can make many leaders feel estranged from their day-to-day duties and disinterested in the outcomes of the M&A.

The Mirror Effect

Projecting the fears of leaders onto the entire organization. When leaders are fearful, they can project those fears onto an entire organization. For example, a recent client undertaking an M&A guaranteed to all employees that there would be zero job cuts for the first three years. But when we met the executive team, they were convinced that these assurances did not apply to people at the senior leader level. Their concerns about “unofficial” job cuts eventually invaded employee discussions at all levels of the organization. Once employees saw that their leaders had lost faith in the organization’s pledge, they also began to lose faith.

The Road Runner and Wile E. Coyote Scenario

Making rash decisions and falling off the proverbial cliff. Those of us who grew up watching this iconic cartoon may remember that no matter how hard he worked or what gimmick he employed, Wile E. Coyote could never catch the Road Runner. The problem was that the Coyote, in his desperation, was willing to try anything without pausing to consider the wisdom of his schemes. This is certainly a scenario we see in M&As.

When attempting M&As, leaders sometimes believe they must always be making, announcing and implementing integration decisions. If too few managers or employees are involved in formulating those decisions, however, there is a high risk of disengagement. Before announcing any decision, it’s important to reach out to as many people as possible to discuss the ramifications. Just as Wile E. Coyote discovered, making bad decisions quickly and in isolation can lead you over the proverbial cliff.

The Broken Record Syndrome

Keep selling the rationale of the deal instead of tackling practical issues. We often see that, in order to meet communication expectations, leaders fall into the habit of just repeating core messages over and over again and never acknowledging that new problems have arisen. When the message is out of date and deliberately ignores new developments, it can completely undermine leadership’s reputation. Sometimes, it’s better to be silent rather than redundant.

Abandonment Issues

Not supporting middle managers. Middle managers form the backbone of most organizations. They are the frontline for all the questions, fears, anger and confusion an employee may experience in the midst of an integration. Despite that reality, middle managers are often forgotten when it comes to managing an integration. If the leaders of an M&A starve middle managers of information and leave them unable to answer the most basic of questions, those managers and their teams will quickly lose faith in the integration.

The First Spring Flower Syndrome

Claiming success prematurely. Anyone who has lived through an M&A knows it can be a long, unpredictable and sometimes uncomfortable journey. Despite this, senior leaders are sometimes quick to claim victory once the process has been launched. This is particularly true of cultural integration. It will take months, maybe even years, for two different cultures to mesh and find a happy, productive common ground. Claiming victory prematurely can frustrate workforces and actually lengthen the gestation period for a full integration.

The challenge of avoiding these pitfalls of cultural integration often falls to HR leaders. Based on our experience working side-by-side with HR leaders in the throes of integration, LHH has identified several best practices that can help bridge the cultural gap experienced during many M&As.

These best practices include but are not limited to:

Best practices that can help bridge the cultural gap experienced during many M&As

Create a “cultural” workstream led by the senor leadership team

A workstream focused on cultural integration can determine the distinct qualities in the DNA of both organizations and identify what is shared and how to create common ground. A cultural workstream ensures both entities respect each other’s values and histories.

Measure the truth

Regularly survey the field to get an honest assessment of how the integration is progressing. When events are unfolding rapidly in an M&A, we tend to demonstrate greater biases and make more assumptions. To figure out exactly how well the organization is handling an integration, it’s important to survey different levels of the organization and encourage an open dialogue so that everyone knows what’s really going on.

Clarify expectations around new leadership behaviors

Successful organizations take early steps to articulate the leadership values and behaviors necessary to facilitate the integration. Clearly communicating these expectations lets leaders know that they must be prepared to change their own behaviors to successfully drive an integration.

Invest heavily in the middle managers to build foundational leadership skills, fill intercultural gaps and mitigate unconscious bias

 The capacity and willingness of middle managers to adopt the new integrated culture can make or break an M&A. During the early stages of an integration, where important first impressions are made, middle managers must know why and when things are happening so that they can keep the workforce up to speed and solidly invested in the integration.

As an HR leader, don’t get caught up in the technical aspects of the integration

To avoid getting caught in the tall grass of technical details, organize collaborative workshops with key leaders from both entities. These forums can help leaders quickly flag issues and deliver solutions that demonstrate that the new integrated organization is just as concerned about people as financial projections.

Secure your key talent

Senior talent not only drive results, they retain the knowledge and experience necessary for future success. Incentives and tailored working conditions will be essential to retaining these people. Retaining key talent will prove to be much more cost effective than having to go out and replace them.

The one positive aspect of the “abysmal” record of M&A success is that it has provided us with an abundance of data about what companies are doing wrong, which can actually help us draft a blueprint for a successful integration.

In M&As, as in life, we can always learn from the mistakes of others and commit to doing things a different way.

Source: lhh.com

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Change Management Workforce Transformations

Putting Your Best Skills Forward in Career Transition

Putting Your Best Skills Forward in Career Transition

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

Putting Your Best Skills Forward in Career Transition

Navigating the hiring market can be difficult at the best times. For professionals and executives currently in transition, securing a new opportunity may be especially challenging as unemployment rates continue to increase. 

To succeed in this ultra-competitive hiring market, candidates will need to adopt a new approach to gain the attention of hiring executives. In this one-hour webinar, Kevin Tennant, Partner, Executive Interim Management, will outline a proven strategy for landing a new interim or permanent role during these unprecedented times of economic uncertainty. 

He will discuss: 

  • How to articulate your skill-set as a solution to current business challenges.
  • The right way to communicate your unique value proposition to land meetings.
  • Strategies for networking in a virtual environment.
  • Proven tactics for securing a new engagement through proactive outreach.

Watch it now:

Source: lhh.com

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Organizational Development

The Black Sheep of Wellbeing

The Black Sheep of Wellbeing

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

The Black Sheep of Wellbeing

Corporate wellbeing often equates to free fruit, gym memberships and perhaps a lunchtime yoga session or two. However, what’s often overlooked, and arguably more impactful, is a focus on careers.

An interview with Carmel Batticciotto, Talent Development Leader, LHH

When organisations focus on corporate wellbeing, more often than not they gravitate towards free fruit, gym memberships and maybe even a lunchtime yoga session or two. However, what’s often overlooked, but can have a much bigger impact, is a focus on careers.

Carmel Batticciotto calls it ‘Careerfulness’ – making sure that you look after your career wellbeing. The talent development leader at LHH says corporate wellbeing is more important than ever given the current employment conditions but it is often something neglected by employers.

“We know that this has been a tough year for many, so supporting wellbeing is more important than ever and there is no doubt more organisations are looking into wellbeing programs for their employees,” she said. “But this is so much more than just ticking the EAP box. This is about understanding all elements of wellbeing and providing support to your people which will have the greatest impact.  You can fund as many gym memberships as you like, however if your people are not happy at work, this may not have the impact you are aiming for.”

“Career wellbeing is one of the most important aspects of an individual’s overall wellbeing.”

Analytics and advisory firm Gallup says there are five broad categories that are essential to most people:

  • Career Wellbeing: how you occupy your time or simply liking what you do every day
  • Social Wellbeing: about having strong relationships and love in your life
  • Financial Wellbeing: effectively managing your economic life
  • Physical Wellbeing: having good health and enough energy to get things done on a daily basis
  • Community Wellbeing: the sense of engagement you have with the area where you live

According to Gallup, while 66% of people are doing well in at least one of these areas, just 7% are thriving in all five.

The underlying issue is that people generally under-estimate the impact of their career on their overall wellbeing. We need to ensure that we focus on all areas of our wellbeing, and give career wellbeing the focus it deserves. If you don’t have the opportunity to regularly do something you enjoy, the odds of you having a high level of wellbeing in other areas quickly diminish.

“Our work is our identity,” says Batticciotto.  “Think back to a time when you were in a job that you didn’t enjoy and how it affected all areas of your life.  It has multiple impacts. And people who lose their job or have been unemployed for several months – the stress is even greater.”

Batticciotto pointed to a study published in The Economic Journal which said unemployment might be the only major life event from which people do not fully recover within five years.

“The study followed 130,000 people for several decades. It showed that our wellbeing recovers more rapidly from the death of a spouse than it does from a sustained period of unemployment. That is quite astounding.”

“Through career development programs we are helping individuals to take control of their careers and increase their sense of empowerment. Is what they are doing now the right role for them?  How do they learn more about themselves and their full range of career options?” 

“One thing that has come out of COVID-19 is that organisations have been more flexible and are engaging with their employees differently.”

“However, we are also seeing a lot of organisations take the foot off the accelerator when it comes to career development. There will be many individuals whose career path has been stalled. Promotions aren’t happening. Leaders are no longer having career conversations with staff. It is having a real impact on morale.  I understand the impact that COVID-19 has had on the market, however, now is the time to demonstrate the value you place on your people and communicate how they can manage their careers and continuous learning in this new environment. 

“We have had a lot of talk about individuals and companies pivoting. Another challenge we see is that organisations are not being strategic around actively reskilling their people to move into the roles of the now and into the future. It is about being really clear on what your future workforce looks like.  This includes ensuring that career pathways are visible to the workforce and providing options so they can move into those new career pathways.”

“Organisations need to have the right systems and processes/frameworks in place to enable career agility. It’s all about careerfulness!”

Source: lhh.com

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Change Management

6 Tips for a Successful Redeployment Strategy

6 Tips for a Successful Redeployment Strategy

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

As organisations restructure themselves to be future-ready, redeploying existing talent into new roles seems like a clear win-win, but can often be simply the path of least resistance . Read these 6 tips for a successful redeployment strategy.

It’s almost impossible to miss the many articles about the future world of work where we are told that by 2025 more than a third of roles will no longer exist; skills and capability requirements will continue to change at an accelerated pace and job tenure will continue to shrink!

It comes as no surprise then, that we should expect a significant increase in redeployment – the transfer of an employee to another role within the same organisation.  

Most organisations offer some form of redeployment support to their impacted employees.  Redeployment success is frequently measured via number of employees with role changes who source another internal role i.e. we redeployed 50% of people whose roles no longer exist in our structure.  However, this is not the true indicator of a successful redeployment strategy.  Real success is to be found in the number of employees who redeploy, who are engaged to perform well in their new roles and express a desire to actively develop their careers and capability in partnership with their employers, taking into consideration not just for current role requirements but also looking to the future.    

So how do we reinvent redeployment to ensure that employees are career agile and future skilled for new economy jobs?

Success in the new economy requires a considerable mindset shift.  We need to reconsider redeployees to better harness their talent and potential, recognising the opportunity to source new roles internally, through developing their careers in ways that contribute positively to their future job satisfaction, employability, and the achievement of organisational performance.  We need to move away from the label “Redeployee” to a more accurate and optimistic epithet “Talent”.

In my experience, redeployment often consists of providing information about available roles and assistance with internal recruitment processes.  The opportunity exists to support employees to develop career agility, future proof their skills and make improved and informed decisions about their next role, as illustrated via Sarah’s story.

“I was told that my role was redundant but the company wanted to keep me on; I was given information about new available roles and I had 4 weeks to make a decision or take a redundancy.  I really liked my old job, my leader, the team, the task content, so I was mourning the loss of that and really confused about what I wanted to do next. 

I spoke to friends, family and my manager and managers of some of the areas that had new roles and received a lot of different advice that to be honest made me even more confused.  In the end, I took a role because it was there and I was scared to leave the company in what I thought was a tough job market.  It turned out to be a big mistake.  I didn’t gel with the team and my day to day activities gave me no satisfaction.  6 months later, I found myself in performance management for the first time in my life!”

Sarah’s story is a lose: lose: lose scenario – for her; her leader and the organisation.  Sadly, this story is repeated in various versions every day. 

To establish truly successful redeployment processes, the potential of your organisational “Talent” needs to be genuinely embraced. Here are 6 ways to design and implement a redeployment strategy that contributes positively to building an engaged and talented future workforce. 

1. Be clear on what you want to achieve from your redeployment strategy. 

How can you futureproof your employees’ careers and skills to align with current and future organisational needs? What does success look like and how you will measure outcomes?  Advances in survey technology make it easier to collect engagement and performance data specific to individuals who have redeployed.

2. Provide employees with professional career decision making support. 

In Sarah’s words – “I really needed someone independent and skilled in career planning to put structure to my thinking – if I’d had that I am confident I would have made a different decision re my next role and development plan”.  An added benefit of good career planning is the ability to self-reflect on current capability and how that aligns to future skill requirements.

3. Ensure good systems are in place, so that employees can source information about opportunities. 

Information about available roles, how to apply, and practical assistance with resume and interview skills remains important but it’s not enough by itself in today’s rapidly changing world of work.  For larger organisations, consider creating a digital talent exchange, by establishing systems whereby talent can search for opportunities and leaders can search for talent. 

4. Enable your leaders to engage in effective career conversations by building their capability. 

Many employees are great impression managers – but are often afraid to share detail pertinent to their career with their Boss.  It can be difficult for an employee to say : “I really want to step back for the next 6 months” or “ I really want to make a career change”.  Supporting leaders to ask open questions about skills, values and interests facilitates a deeper and more meaningful outcome.

5. Innovate and create

Initiatives such as career months or internal career fairs; lunch and learns which share stories about critical career steps taken by your leaders; identify and share research articles and webinars about future careers and the changing world of work.

6. Create a culture of continuous learning and career management 

More organisations are flagging change earlier with their employees, sometimes 2-3 years out, identifying the need to develop new capabilities and skill sets for future economy roles and developing support strategies based on a shared responsibility between the organisation and the individual to reskill. 

About The Author
Helen Burton is the Executive Director of Lee Hecht Harrison in Qld and has over 25 years’ experience in restructuring, change, redeployment and career transition. 

Source: lhh.com

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Change Management Workforce Transformations

Do the Terms “Radical” and “Transformation” Go Hand in Hand?

Do the Terms “Radical” and “Transformation” Go Hand in Hand?

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

Do the Terms “Radical” and “Transformation” Go Hand in Hand?

We share four key learnings from senior leaders who got together in Zurich to discuss workforce transformation challenges.

When companies envision something as significant as workforce transformation, radical certainly seems to be the appropriate adjective. Employees need new skills to perform new tasks in profoundly different ways. It all adds up to an overwhelming sense that transformation can only be accomplished through radical means.

The problem is that the term radical often misrepresents the essence of workforce transformation, according to a group of senior business leaders LHH convened in Zurich to discuss the realities of workforce transformation.

In short, most workforce transformation scenarios involve steady, constant alterations in the type of people you employ and the kinds of skills they possess – usually to keep pace in a business environment that experiences steady, constant changes in business planning and strategy.

Simone Gibertoni, CEO of Clinique La Prairie, a European medical spa firm, suggested that the need to radically transform a workforce is evidence, in and of itself, of an organization that has fallen behind. “If you’re having to radically transform your organization, you’re already in danger,” he said.

Gibertoni went on to describe the essence of a successful workforce transformation as “small improvements every day that will help you … instill a culture of making today better than yesterday.”

However, Gibertoni also acknowledged that non-radical transformation does not mean sluggish or leisurely. “You still need a 2x-speed organization,” he said. “One that is focused on improving the core of what you do … and second, focusing on what will bring you success in the future. Especially in the luxury business, you need leaders who are able to balance innovation for the future with the heritage of the past.”

Other panelists at the Zurich event were very much in lockstep with Gibertoni’s argument, although some believed that in some instances, radical transformation may be the only option left.

Frank Waltmann, Head of Organizational Excellence for LafargeHolcim, the global building product manufacturer, described a scenario from a previous organization where a new CEO was brought in to address severe performance problems that were threatening the very future of the organization. After assessing the gravity of the situation, the CEO opted for rapid, radical transformation, he said.

This approach was likely necessary because of the threat to the company, but it was still difficult for many of the employees. “For the employees of this company, the transformation was like a nuclear bomb going off,” Waltmann said. “There was a real sense of urgency due to the severity of the issues. Employees needed their leaders to be tough and face ambiguity head on – not behaviors that leaders were used to demonstrating. As a result, a lot of those leaders exited the business.”

The panelists did agree that no two transformational journeys are the same, and the key to a successful transformation is the presence of transformational leadership. Sarah Kane, a partner in the PwC global advisory business, said it was particularly important for leaders to include innovation as part of any transformation initiative. Creating a culture that can thrive during change and try new things is essential to helping any organization transform its workforce. “People need to be allowed to fail, but fail fast,” she said.

Four key lessons learned from the front lines of transformation

Overall, the discussion about whether transformation needs to be radical was only one of the many talking points at the Zurich conference. The panelists also shared four key lessons they learned from the front lines of transformation.

Use only three or four KPIs. 

In many cases, organizations get carried away with multiple metrics they think will help define their success. But this often leads to more confusion, time wasting and failure. Focus on a small number of key metrics and move forward.

Don’t neglect the middle. 

In many transformations, the focus is on ensuring that senior leaders are engaged, because they are primarily responsible for leading the change. The middle managers who serve as the heartbeat of the organization are often ignored. This neglect can be a huge problem, as middle managers may feel the most threatened by transformation. Devote some time and energy to helping this important leadership class engage with transformation.

Cultivate transformational leaders who can imagine a bold, new future for your organization. 

Transformational leadership requires leaders to be visionary, connect the organization and inspire active participation in change. Transformational leaders must be comfortable with ambiguity and unafraid to take calculated risks.

View innovation as essential to survival.

In order to grow, organizations must be able to innovate, whether that’s adopting new technologies, developing new solutions or creating new and engaging customer experiences. Leaders must have their fingers on the pulse of industry developments, creating a culture that cultivates and tests new ideas.

All the panelists agreed that we are no longer in a “business as usual” environment and as a result, leaders need to move on from what worked in the past to develop new transformational skills for the future.

Source: lhh.com

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Change Management Workforce Transformations

How to Build Better Relationships with Your Employees

How to Build Better Relationships with Your Employees

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

offering career development

Learn why offering career development will help you build a workforce that has the skills you need, and is loyal, engaged and productive.

It was a sign of the times.

Late last year, The New York Times published a fascinating article that examined Amazon’s decision to end its stock option program for employees.

For many years, all employees of the online retailing giant received a limited number of shares when they were hired and then annual stock options after that. Going forward, there will be no awarded shares; Amazon employees will have a direct stock purchase plan starting sometime in 2019.

The new Amazon policy does not represent a new trend in employee relations. Rather, it is a confirmation that the relationship between employers and their employees has officially and irreversibly changed.

As the article noted, there was a time in the United States when all the largest employers in the country—Procter & Gamble, S.C. Johnson, Hallmark Cards, U.S. Steel and Sears among others—provided stock options to all employees regardless of rank, sometimes along with defined benefit pension plans. These perks allowed employees to assume a vested interest in the financial performance of the companies they worked for. It also provided an important source of financial security for employees in their retirement years.

Today, the relationship between employer and employee is more complex and not so easily sustained by something like a stock option.

Amazon’s decision on stock options signals that the paternalistic relationship between a company and its workers is more or less officially dead. In many ways, this is a reality that was arrived at mutually between employers and employees.

Employers are fully aware that today, in this age of transformation, the kind of talent they need to compete is constantly changing, and they simply cannot retain everyone in perpetuity. Even top performers can sometimes become redundant when the nature of the job changes dramatically.

The same holds true for employees.

Today, it seems that employees value mobility, opportunities to advance their careers and take on new challenges, and working conditions that provide the best opportunities for a work-life balance. Few seek lifelong connections to a single company. More than ever before, the average worker is prepared to quit and seek a better job if they don’t like their current gig.

From an employer’s point of view, however, this new relationship can be a challenge. Without stock options, profit sharing and defined retirement savings programs to build meaningful relationships with your employees, loyalty, productivity and engagement can suffer.

A disengaged workforce rarely demonstrates top-drawer productivity. The resulting environment drives away your best people and triggers excessive separation and severance payouts. A lack of employee loyalty can damage your company’s brand and make it difficult to recruit top talent in the future.

All of these problems have one thing in common: they will ultimately show up on the bottom line of your company’s financial statements. You simply cannot drive superior business results with low productivity, high separation and severance costs and a damaged brand.

Our responses to this dilemma have seen mixed results.

Some employers have tried to make work “fun” by creating open workplaces and offering employees free food or indoor basketball courts and foosball tables. When they were first introduced, these things may have seemed cool and progressive. But as the hard reality of the global talent shortage has set in, it’s obvious these gimmicks had a relatively short shelf life. They simply did not build productive relationships between employer and employee.

To build more stable and fruitful relationships, some big companies have looked to basic wages as the key connector with their employees. In the United States, companies such as Walmart and McDonald’s made significant efforts to raise starting wages to get closer to what activists believe is a basic living income. However, a higher hourly wage is not the only thing they are doing.

Family benefits – including enhanced time off to care for sick family members or to start a family – are part of an array of new tools employers are using to connect to their employees. There is solid logic behind these strategies. Money alone has a limited impact on the long-term relationship between employers and employees; but other non-monetary benefits like enhanced, paid leave and flexible work terms can make someone’s life better.

However, there is another avenue for employers to examine in their pursuit of a stable, productive relationship with their employees: showing a genuine interest in career development.

Career development and programs that promote reskilling or upskilling (re-/upskilling), can help drive higher retention, productivity and engagement, and it can also profoundly reduce the amount of money employers spend on giving redundant workers a soft landing after a layoff. This is about embracing strategies such as redeployment to keep good people while helping them acquire the most in-demand skills.

Through research, LHH has conclusively established the relationship between career management and talent engagement and retention. A 2016 study showed that 63 percent of employees believed a lack of career management opportunities caused them to look at changing jobs.

Unfortunately, it seems that too few organizations realize the potential of career management. The survey found that an alarming 36 percent of managers did not know anything about the career goals of their direct reports.

That data certainly calls into question the major reason why organizations claim they do not offer career management.

Business leaders often say they are reluctant to invest in their employees’ careers because they will only leave and take their new skills to another employer. Our data seems to suggest that employees who get career development opportunities are the ones who stay, not the ones who leave.

Now, it’s important to realize that one size will not fit all. Salespeople, for example, will likely demand commissions as their principal form of payment, because it is the reward that motivates them and ensures they drive results. In this case, it makes sense to offer these employees the types of benefits and rewards that inspire them to excel. But for many others, cash bonuses are not as important as a better overall working experience, as well as opportunities to grow and evolve along with their employers.

The bottom line: invest in the development of your employees’ careers, and you will reap multiple, meaningful benefits that go way beyond a more robust engagement.

Career development will yield a workforce that is loyal, engaged and productive, and you will avoid the vicious cycle of firing-and-hiring new talent to meet new skill needs. Instead, you will find yourself in a virtuous circle where employers do more to meet the needs of their employees, now and in the future.

Source: lhh.com

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Change Management

If Your Organization Need Downsizing, Ask This Key Question First

If Your Organization Need Downsizing, Ask This Key Question First

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

If Your Organization Need Downsizing, Ask This Key Question First

For organizations struggling to find their way in a world reshaped forever by COVID-19, three practices can help companies more effectively manage downsizing, minimize layoffs, and enhance their talent strategy with reskilling, upskilling and redeployment.

John Morgan, COO & EVP, Americas, LHH

After 15 years in leadership at the world’s leading provider of outplacement services, I have identified two inescapable truths about layoffs.

First, layoffs are sometimes a necessity for organizations that need to transform the way they do business, reduce costs, incorporate new technology, or optimize the use of their talent.

And second, some of the world’s most successful organizations are responding to these very same challenges while minimizing layoffs.

Why would a leading provider of outplacement services want to highlight strategies to minimize the use of layoffs in some situations? It’s a good question that I am facing more and more in my conversations with client organizations.

I tell our clients that one of the advantages of being an industry leader is that it allows us to see the emerging trends before a lot of other players. In this instance, employers are rethinking downsizing strategies to include not only a well-thought-out transition plan that provides outplacement, but also identifies alternatives that can minimize the impact to the workforce.

One thing is certain: post-pandemic, we need to reimagine a better approach to layoffs that not only provides a framework of support to employees through this crisis, but also provides a framework for organizations to build a highly skilled workforce that’s prepared for the future.

The new reality around layoffs

When organizations transform or economies deteriorate, layoffs are an inevitable result. Today, we see some of the world’s biggest companies that found themselves on the wrong side of the “essential services” equation have seen their prospects disappear overnight.

Companies in the retail, arts and culture, airline, hospitality, and tourism industries have been forced to undertake swift and severe reductions in costs that inevitably resulted in widespread layoffs. 

But not every company is facing the same drastic economic pressures. Many others have seen their business models profoundly disrupted, but not decimated. These organizations need to transform what they do, how they do it, and the people they employ.

In the past, outplacement services have played an important role in helping organizations manage workforce transformations to produce the best possible outcomes for both employer and employee. However, during the 2009 financial crisis many companies clearly cut too aggressively, making recovery painfully slow.  Today, we see many organizations have learned from this experience and are adopting a strategy that balances cost cutting to survive today and investing to grow in the future, positioning themselves for success after recovery.

Most of the CEOs or CHROs I talk with already know that this is the best way forward.

The global skills shortage that existed pre-pandemic has not disappeared with the arrival of COVID-19. Shedding people now in the hopes that you can replace them with employees better suited to the future may not be a viable strategy.

Organizations may also neglect to consider the costs of layoffs that go beyond expenditures on severance and separation. In a world where harsh verdicts come swiftly from traditional and social media, a poorly communicated or poorly managed layoff can do irreparable harm to a company’s relationships with its employees and customers.

The key question all business leaders need to ask themselves

For organizations faced with a need downsizing, the question is simple: can we reduce the number of layoffs and, instead, build a workforce of the future through reskilling, upskilling and redeployment?

The best news I have for organizations facing this question is that there is a win-win scenario here.

The holistic approach to downsizings

Applying the best practices of industry leaders in outplacement, and successful companies that have a reputation for a forward-looking approach to downsizing, there are three key best practices that must be undertaken as part of workforce planning before layoffs are triggered. 

1.  Assessment

Large organizations often lack detailed information about the capabilities of the people they employ. They know who they are, a basic job description and some details on performance. But they don’t have a complete picture of all the skills their people possess. This is a blind spot. It’s also an easily reparable deficit. Assessment instruments to evaluate workforce skills can quickly create a map of your organization’s current talent capabilities and where you may need new or different people.

2.  Analytics

Assessment, on its own, will provide an excellent picture of the here and now. However, to understand future skill needs, you want to do a deeper analytical dive. This involves an intensive analysis of current job descriptions and a diagnostic to determine which are most likely to be affected by advances in technology, specifically what roles will disappear, what roles will be augmented, and what new roles will be added. Identifying those jobs that can be performed by machines is essential. But it’s about more than that. This analysis can then be used to identify current employees who have the attitude and the aptitude to transition, with an investment in reskilling or upskilling, into future-fit roles within the organization.

3.  Redeployment

If you have successfully undertaken the first two stages, then you’re ready to consider a more advanced stage. While some layoffs will still be required, you can proceed with confidence knowing you’ve done everything you can to minimize the impact. Many of our clients are finding that with some upfront assessment and talent mapping, they are now positioned to efficiently reskill and redeploy employees rather than lay them off. That not only quickly and cost-effectively fills talent holes but saves on severance and separation benefits. For those layoffs that prove impossible to avoid, you’ll want to offer the individuals outplacement services to ensure their transition into a new position is smooth. That will help contain severance and separation costs, limit any damage to employer brand, and get employees back to work faster.

It’s important to note that many of our clients who invest in assessment and analytics ultimately find they can significantly reduce the number of people they are letting go. Armed with relevant data, they have a complete picture of all employees and future roles they may be able to fill. This ensures that organizations are bringing out the most value out of their people, both for now and well into the future, while minimizing severance and separation costs.

Business leaders have come to understand that drastic times require drastic actions. In the past, that has meant swift and sometimes significant layoffs to address financial pressures. 

However, during the unprecedented economic challenges we now face, it’s time we rethink our downsizing playbook. 

That will mean reimagining our approach based on assessments, analytics, business intelligence and redeployment. This is the future of workforce planning and there is no better time to get with the program than now.

Source: lhh.com

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Organizational Development

Strategies to Balance Labor Market Surpluses and Shortages and a Growing Skills Gap

Strategies to Balance Labor Market Surpluses and Shortages and a Growing Skills Gap

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

Strategies to Balance Labor Market Surpluses and Shortages and a Growing Skills Gap

Balance Labor Market Surpluses and Shortages and a Growing Skills Gap.

The global economic fallout from COVID-19 has resulted in unprecedented volatility, impacting every part of the labor market. While some sectors have been decimated resulting in millions of workers being displaced, some sectors are experiencing accelerated growth and job gains. At the same time many impacted workers aren’t prepared for change and don’t have the skills they need for future roles. 

Caroline Pfeiffer-Marinho, Executive Vice President of EMEA at LHH and Arne Hellmuth, Managing Director of Transformation Solutions at LHH Deutschland have a conversation about an innovative way to build a frictionless pathway between companies that need to shed workers with those companies that urgently need to hire.

In this conversation, Caroline and Arne discuss:

• Factors shaping labor market trends
• Matching supply and demand in labor markets
• Steps to creating a frictionless pathway
• Creating a sustainable future that puts people first

Source: lhh.com

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility Change Management

Outplacement – A Best Practice in Successful Termination

Outplacement – A Best Practice in Successful Termination

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

Outplacement – A Best Practice in Successful Termination

Companies need to make changes in their business model to survive the COVID-19 pandemic. Oftentimes, it will cause employees to lose their job. By using outplacement support, this allows the companies to successfully make the change while caring for the employees who are terminated.

Vicente KILAYKO – Director, LHH Philippines

When I first saw the movie “Up in the Air” I always said to myself that this was a product of Hollywood fantasy until last week.  I was part of a team from Lee Hecht Harrison (LHH) that had to support the Tell-Day of a large company and because of COVID-19 it had to be done virtually.  There I was at home sitting in front of a laptop and looking at the scene of an empty meeting room. The employee was being notified in the next room that she will no longer have a job.

Soon they came in and the HR introduced Anne (not her real name) who was a manager and she sat down in front of the company laptop. It was very obvious that she was crying even before I started our conversation. I learned quickly that supporting an impacted employee virtually is almost the same as face-to-face. As I concentrated on Anne, I completely forgot that we were separated by distance and technology.

As we talked, Anne told me that she was ok but was crying because she was concerned for her team.  When I told her how we will support her and her team with our transition program, she began to calm down but never really stopped crying.  After 30 minutes and as we were about to end, Anne said, “Thank you very much for talking to me. Now I can go home. I understand why the company had to do this because of the pandemic and the lack of sales.  I also want to thank the company for helping us through this difficult period.” Powerful words from someone who just lost her job!

Where can you find a situation where you lay-off employees and they still say thank you? In the 20 years that LHH has been in the Philippines, we have seen the evolution of companies now recognizing outplacement as a best practice.

Outplacement, often confused with “Outsourcing or “Job Placement”, is a structured approach towards a next career for employees who have been terminated. It is conducted on behalf of the company making the change and is tailored to the level of the individual in the organization. In short it is “Caring for employees impacted by change.”

The Benefits Of The LHH Outplacement From The Company Making The Changes Are

1. Notification is conducted Correctly and Sensitively.

As part of the preparation, LHH will work with the leaders on how to clearly deliver the message, manage the reaction and to map out the next steps. As in the case of Anne, LHH can be present as part of the Tell-Day support to help the impacted employee cope with the emotions, advice on Do’s & Don’ts and outline the transition support.

As the day ended last week, we received feedback from the leaders that they saw a distinct positive change in the attitude of the impacted employees after they had talked to LHH. They thanked the LHH team for our contribution.

2. Eases the Stress and Trauma for the Implementation Team

Without a doubt, termination is very stressful to the leaders of the company implementing the change. However, when we start to advice on the best practices, you can see the growing confidence in the ability to implement a successful separation. There are checklists including logistical support, medical and security arrangement, timing, communication, etc. It is no longer a blank sheet but structures, procedures, guidelines and suggested FAQs.

3. Protects or even Enhances the Company Brand

Our most successful experience in helping companies manage changes in the organization are those that included LHH in the planning stage. The key element is to synchronize the messaging to the key stakeholders ie the employee who will be terminated, employees who will remain, suppliers/partners and the market. Timing and content of these messages are important. The results have been a positive image for the company.

4. Maintains the Morale of the Remaining Staff

The most important group of employees in a restructuring are those that are remaining after the change. They will now achieve the goals of the company with less headcount. The change must be clearly explained and to seek out anyone who has doubts or questions. Sometimes they will experience what we term as “survivors’ guilt” and this must be addressed. Best practice is to deliver a change management intervention for the stayers.

5. Minimize the Possibility of Legal Action

Based on our experience, impacted employees file a legal challenge not because of the change itself but on how they were terminated. If the notifying leaders are properly briefed, then loss of face, promises or hurting words are avoided. When outplacement support is provided, the employee feels the care of the company and rarely ever files a case.

6. Fulfills a Social Responsibility

A terminated employee needs to be supported. If the company does not provide outplacement, then it is society (family, friends, and community) that will have to help the unemployed. In some cases he/she becomes a social problem. Outplacement is now increasingly recognized as part of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of companies. CSR is not just the external activities of companies but internally as well. Proof are the continuing increase in the number of Philippine companies that have become customers of LHH.

Source: lhh.com.ph

Categories
Career Transition, Outplacement and Mobility

Outplacement: How to Separate the Experts from the Opportunists

Outplacement: How to Separate the Experts from the Opportunists

Let us help you turn
your workforce into a
true force

Contact us

At a time of extraordinary economic uncertainty, contracting with a human capital firm with no prior experience in outplacement is simply not a well-advised option for an organization undergoing massive change.

It is as predictable – and as depressing – as death and taxes. Whenever there is a significant downturn in the economy, there is a corresponding flood of firms from the far reaches of the human capital industry, all of them scrambling to grab a piece of what they believe to be an outplacement gold rush.

It is true that economic downturns, particularly deep and sustained ones, do prompt layoffs as a response to precipitous losses in revenue.

But at a moment like that, contracting with a human capital firm with no prior experience in outplacement is simply not a well-advised option for an organization facing an economic crisis.

That certainly doesn’t stop some firms with expertise in other areas of human capital – talent management, recruitment, leadership development, coaching – from trying to quickly set up shop in an area of human capital that appears to represent growth opportunities. 

These opportunists do not, however, really understand how career transition fits into the continuum of human capital strategies. And their lack of knowledge and expertise can have disastrous consequences.

Professional, well planned and smoothly executed, outplacement is, first and foremost, the hallmark of a caring organization. It is a process that reflects a paramount reality: employees, even those who are no longer needed, are still valued and should be treated with the same care and respect as when they were hired. Properly executed, it can be a lifeline for redundant workers, and an important pillar in an organization’s employer brand.

In short, outplacement that meets high standards can be a win-win for both individual and organization.

When managed poorly, however, there is no limit to the damage it can do to all involved.

The true cost of a career transition gone wrong

In April 2020, electric scooter rental company Bird—which had been valued at more than US $2 billion prior to the pandemic, earned harsh reviews for its decision to lay off more than 400 employees, nearly one-third of its workforce. As cities began to impose shelter-in-place orders, the company’s revenues were devastated. 

In what could only be described as a pandemic-era experience, the employees found out the bad news via Zoom conference call where an unfamiliar woman’s voice without any video delivered a very brief, very succinct message that they had been laid off. Employees found out that they were being locked out of Slack and company email during the Zoom call. 

The company’s CEO did send out a longer email to the affected employees later in the day, but the decision to announce the layoffs via mass video conference instantly became news around the world, with social media chatter suggesting that many former customers would reconsider their decision to use Bird again once pandemic restrictions were eased.

Career transition is more than just another transaction

It is unclear whether Bird retained a partner to help them with these layoffs, but it’s highly unlikely. The tell-tale sign is the fact that Bird treated the layoffs as just another business transaction, which is the central flaw in the approach used by speculators trying to get into the outplacement business.

Inexperienced career transition firms typically operate on an assumption that employers just want to get rid of people as quickly as possible and don’t really care how it’s done. This shows up in the limited support they provide. There is an underlying belief that every affected individual is exactly the same and only requires a small settlement, some help writing a resumé, and directions to a job board. These firms assess the success of their service based on how quickly they can move someone out of the organization and into the job market, all of them loudly promoting the same “time to landing” figures but falling short when it comes to meaningful results. 

No muss, no fuss, and certainly no real insights into the dynamics of the current job market. 

There are several obvious fallacies in this approach that can be spotted before signing up with the wrong firm. 

4 questions to ask when choosing an outplacement provider

Professional, qualified outplacement providers have a proven and easily identified record of success. They have worked with all types and sizes of companies. They also offer a broad range of solutions and services to address the unique needs that exist at different levels of an organization. A proven career transition expert not only knows how to support line-level employees through outplacement, but also offers boutique solutions for the C-Suite.

Ask these four questions before selecting a provider:

1. Do they propose alternatives to layoffs?

There are many instances where layoffs simply cannot be avoided. However, experienced career transition firms will make it clear that outplacement support is only one option in an array of workforce management strategies. These career transition firms will make sure other cost-effective options—such as retraining, reskilling and redeployment—have been fully explored before people are let go. 

2. Are they only focused on getting your people out the door or do they really care about their future?

Experienced career transition firms know that when layoffs are unavoidable, success is not measured purely in how quickly an individual can be moved into any new job. Some people won’t have a similar job to go to in another organization. Those people need more than a course on resumé writing and interviewing techniques. They need an experienced firm to identify career pathways—which may involve reskilling or upskilling—to not only find their next job, but arguably a better job.

3. Are they able to connect your former employees with real job leads, or just pointing them towards a job board?

The best outplacement partners are those who can connect your people with known talent managers who are interviewing and hiring talented people in real time to fill open jobs. Most of the best open positions are never posted on job boards. Access and insight into the hidden jobs market is a specialized talent that most of the pretender firms simply do not possess.

4. Do they want to talk about the future of your workforce?

Companies with the best employer brands know the real challenge today is how to future-proof their workforces to minimize the need to undertake layoffs. You can only do that by figuring out whether you have the right people in the right jobs now, and what kinds of skills you will need going forward. Unfortunately, layoffs are an unavoidable reality during economic downturns. But legitimate career transition firms can help you build a workforce of the future by helping them acquire new skills so they can absorb downturns and market shifts without having to resort to the costly fire-and-hire cycle.

As with any great business challenge, layoffs present both a burden and an opportunity. Having to lay off employees – sometimes large numbers of employees – can be a disruptive experience both for individual and organization. But out of that disruption, opportunities can emerge.

A great outplacement partner understands that if you are forced to lay off some of your people, it’s only because all other options have been exhausted. When the layoffs occur, an experienced career transition firm will make sure that your people are not just moved out, but that they are given the support to truly succeed in what is undoubtedly an uncertain job market.  And in doing so, the partner firm will provide a strategy to protect your reputation as a viable destination for top talent.

And most importantly of all, a trusted career transition partner will ensure that going forward, you will be able to build a workforce that can evolve to meet the challenges of a most uncertain future.

Source: lhh.com

LHH uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more Accept